Lance Armstrong dropped his fight on Thursday night against the doping charges lodged in June by the US Anti-Doping Agency.
He did so without admitting to the allegations that he used banned substances and improper methods to gain an edge in the sport of cycling to win an unprecedented seven Tours de France.
Armstrong faced a Thursday deadline to either accept the charges, fight them before an arbitration panel, or appeal a federal court decision that allowed the case to go ahead.
Although his attorney wrote a letter to USADA that it cannot “retroactively punish” Armstrong, the loss of his seven Tour de France championships is a very real possibility.
USADA chief Thomas Tygart told the AP Thursday evening that it will ban Armstrong from cycling for life and strip him of his seven titles. (The USADA statement issued on Friday.)
Attorney Tim Herman, quoted in the Austin American Statesman, wrote to USADA that an arbitration panel should decide who has jurisdiction in the matter. The International Cycling Union and USA Cycling both have said the Armstrong case belongs in their arena.
In a letter posted on the LanceArmstrong.com website (reprinted in full below), the cyclist wrote:
“There comes a point in every man’s life when he has to say, “Enough is enough.” For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a two-year federal criminal investigation followed by Travis Tygart’s unconstitutional witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense.”
Armstrong went on to say that if he thought he could get a fair deal, he would fight the charges, but he said the process has been “one-sided and unfair.” He continued to stress that he has never failed a drug test, and it perverts the system to open a case on a cyclist without positive A and B samples.
“The bottom line is I played by the rules that were put in place by the UCI, WADA and USADA when I raced,” he wrote.
Armstrong has said before that USADA has no physical evidence. The agency, however, says it had 10 cyclists lined up to testify against him.
Among them, no doubt, were disgraced teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton who have admitted publicly to doping. But others that the USADA had lined up to testify against Armstrong owe him a debt of gratitude for not creating a situation where they’d have to come forward and admit to cheating.
Similar charges are pending against Armstrong’s team manager, Johan Bruyneel, so those 10 may still have to testify if he goes to arbitration.
In a letter to the USADA, Armstrong’s attorneys wrote that “USADA cannot proceed until it submits its evidence to UCI’s independent panel for review and adjudicates any disputes with that panel about jurisdiction, scope, the reliability of the evidence, and all related issues with UCI in CAS. At an absolute minimum, UCI and USADA should go to CAS to resolve the jurisdiction issue before any proceedings begin, a solution offered by UCI but rejected by USADA.”
CyclingNews has a comprehensive timeline of all the Armstrong doping allegations over the years.
Here are links to the stories at CyclingNews and an opinion piece at VeloNews. Also, Sports Illustrated has a long piece that includes lots of background material.
Lance Armstrong’s Statement of August 23, 2012
AUSTIN, Texas – August 23rd, 2012 – There comes a point in every man’s life when he has to say, “Enough is enough.” For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a two-year federal criminal investigation followed by Travis Tygart’s unconstitutional witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense.
I had hoped that a federal court would stop USADA’s charade. Although the court was sympathetic to my concerns and recognized the many improprieties and deficiencies in USADA’s motives, its conduct, and its process, the court ultimately decided that it could not intervene.
If I thought for one moment that by participating in USADA’s process, I could confront these allegations in a fair setting and – once and for all – put these charges to rest, I would jump at the chance. But I refuse to participate in a process that is so one-sided and unfair. Regardless of what Travis Tygart says, there is zero physical evidence to support his outlandish and heinous claims. The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of controls I have passed with flying colors. I made myself available around the clock and around the world. In-competition. Out of competition. Blood. Urine. Whatever they asked for I provided. What is the point of all this testing if, in the end, USADA will not stand by it?
From the beginning, however, this investigation has not been about learning the truth or cleaning up cycling, but about punishing me at all costs. I am a retired cyclist, yet USADA has lodged charges over 17 years old despite its own 8-year limitation. As respected organizations such as UCI and USA Cycling have made clear, USADA lacks jurisdiction even to bring these charges. The international bodies governing cycling have ordered USADA to stop, have given notice that no one should participate in USADA’s improper proceedings, and have made it clear the pronouncements by USADA that it has banned people for life or stripped them of their accomplishments are made without authority. And as many others, including USADA’s own arbitrators, have found, there is nothing even remotely fair about its process. USADA has broken the law, turned its back on its own rules, and stiff-armed those who have tried to persuade USADA to honor its obligations. At every turn, USADA has played the role of a bully, threatening everyone in its way and challenging the good faith of anyone who questions its motives or its methods, all at U.S. taxpayers’ expense. For the last two months, USADA has endlessly repeated the mantra that there should be a single set of rules, applicable to all, but they have arrogantly refused to practice what they preach. On top of all that, USADA has allegedly made deals with other riders that circumvent their own rules as long as they said I cheated. Many of those riders continue to race today.
The bottom line is I played by the rules that were put in place by the UCI, WADA and USADA when I raced. The idea that athletes can be convicted today without positive A and B samples, under the same rules and procedures that apply to athletes with positive tests, perverts the system and creates a process where any begrudged ex-teammate can open a USADA case out of spite or for personal gain or a cheating cyclist can cut a sweetheart deal for themselves. It’s an unfair approach, applied selectively, in opposition to all the rules. It’s just not right.
USADA cannot assert control of a professional international sport and attempt to strip my seven Tour de France titles. I know who won those seven Tours, my teammates know who won those seven Tours, and everyone I competed against knows who won those seven Tours. We all raced together. For three weeks over the same roads, the same mountains, and against all the weather and elements that we had to confront. There were no shortcuts, there was no special treatment. The same courses, the same rules. The toughest event in the world where the strongest man wins. Nobody can ever change that. Especially not Travis Tygart.
Today I turn the page. I will no longer address this issue, regardless of the circumstances. I will commit myself to the work I began before ever winning a single Tour de France title: serving people and families affected by cancer, especially those in underserved communities. This October, my Foundation will celebrate 15 years of service to cancer survivors and the milestone of raising nearly $500 million. We have a lot of work to do and I’m looking forward to an end to this pointless distraction. I have a responsibility to all those who have stepped forward to devote their time and energy to the cancer cause. I will not stop fighting for that mission. Going forward, I am going to devote myself to raising my five beautiful (and energetic) kids, fighting cancer, and attempting to be the fittest 40-year old on the planet.
5 comments
Skip to comment form
Sorry Bis. I know you wanted to believe.
(Perhaps Lance has left you enough wiggle room to maintain that belief, but at some point . . . .)
Author
I was always waiting for a positive doping test like they had against Floyd Landis and other cheaters. That would have left things black and white. The group of eyewitnesses that USADA says they have lined up against Armstrong is a good substitute that shouldn’t leave any wiggle room.
I believe you have to judge a man by the standards of his day. Let’s not be naive or assume culpable actions at that time and place. There was/is a tremendous pressure on Armstrong and the various teams in a sport with a history, a “tradition” if you will, of chemically enhanced performance. This is a thread in all individual and most team sports but ingrained in bicycle racing in my opinion.
Having personal success erradicated without benefit of common administrative process would have been catastrophic to any man with pride. I do not blame Mr. Armstrong at all for his course of action during the appropriate time frame.
Is the intended USADA punishment appropriate for the “crime?” Who will be listed as TdF “winners” in his stea? Will they each be forced to prove their own abstinence? Will the World Series be stripped because of Roger Clemmens (or Derek Jeeter’s) use of performance enhancing drugs? Clearly, No!
Mr. Armstrong may actually enter a kind of tainted martyrdom. His legacy is increased awareness and participation of the bicycle sport in the USA and his Foundation’s tremendous contribution of help. Thank you Lance.
Author
I checked the cyclists who finished in 2nd place the years that Armstrong won. They are hardly paragons of virtue! “Who gets Armstrong’s Tour de France titles?”
I guess all that pressure from years ago prevents Lance from telling the truth today.
At this point, Armstrong is just a coward — a cheating coward who ruined the careers and lives of others while enriching himself.
Apparently, in the minds of some, personal responsibility, accountability, and integrity are for other people.
I can’t tell how much of the Lance-worship is ignorance; how much is just an outlet for faith, like the abiding belief in creationism; and/or how much is an unwillingness to admit that one was suckered.